|
 River Beta Update Archive
View site wide archive
| River Name |
Run Submitted |
Beta Submitted By |
Submitted On |
Approved By |
| Grays River |
|
rhoyerboat |
12/18/2014 7:51:00 PM |
Jed Hawkes |
| ^ Notes: Oops, I didn't understand that the given unit available from the bot which grabs the gauge should determine what the user-reported guidelines have to be. In this case it looks like the programming only returns ft, so without some built-in conversion, what is actually required is a boatable levels recommendation set based on ft rather than cfs. Thanks for addressing it :) but it looks like a boatable level is still not color coded here ;_) I misunderstood the first time, my bad. |
| Grays River |
|
rhoyerboat |
12/18/2014 1:06:00 PM |
JoesKayak |
| ^ Notes: Change recommended to units of gauge calibration. The original setting of feet didn't seem reasonable since the range of those feet would have to be 800-1500, which is far out of recorded gauge ranges when considered in feet. ;) Personally, I don't know if those ranges are good or not (yet,) but I'd be more likely to find out if PP auto-betas were to ever indicate the run was at a known good flow. |
|
|
|
|